Its menu system is very simple and easy to navigate, and it has a clean HDMI output, so you can connect an external recorder without overlays. X-T30, X-E3, Blackmagic Design BMPCC 4K, 6K, Sigma FP, Olympus E-M1 II, Z CAM E2. It delivers satisfactory video quality in FHD and 4k, with particularly good low-light capability in FHD. Buy DJI RS2 Gimbal For Smartphone & Camera (Camera Stabilization, po2. X-T20, X-T30, X-E3, Blackmagicdesign BMPCC 4K, Sigma FP, Olympus E-M1 II.

This has always been a bit underwhelming, as the standard these days seems to be 13 stops -14 stops. The SIGMA fp L is decent for studio video. Shop DJI RSC 2 - 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer for DSLR and Mirrorless Camera. According to Sigma, the fp has 12 stops of dynamic range. I have been testing and using the fp for some time now. But if you insist on using the Ninja V, then shooting full-frame 5.9K in ProResRAW is an advantage. I think the Sigma fp might have more dynamic range than Sigma says. There is nothing like the fp for standalone RAW shooting, and it is not 'pixel binned' RAW it is not that simple. Indeed, it makes no sense to use the fp and and a Ninja V - it provides no IQ advantage at all versus shooting without it. The Sigma fp is only advantageous if you use it as a standalone RAW shooter. You can record 5.9K 30p with the Atomos Ninja V and the S5, in ProResRAW. My main concern is that Fp 4K30p RAW video is pixel binned? but S5 4K30p is oversampled or you can also record the whole 5.9K width of the sensor? What kind of video quality differences it can make? Any other differences like battery consumption, weather resistance or something else? Basically I don't care about EVF, IBIS or back screen because it will be used with Atomos recorder monitor and gimbal.

S5 is about 300€ ($370) more expensive in my country.

Sigma fp gimbal